Change ForumDVDs & Films Forum - [VIDEO] The Amazing Spider-man 3D trailer - Page 1
at 21-5-2013 23:16
Films that were much better second viewing
at 20-5-2013 14:50
[VIDEO] Pacific Rim - wat?
at 18-5-2013 13:52
[VIDEO] Gravity
at 18-5-2013 10:51
SW VII to be shot in the UK
at 13-5-2013 18:56
Olympus has fallen
at 12-5-2013 22:15
Hankcock Blu-Ray Artifacts on PC
at 11-5-2013 23:45
Other Forum ThreadsOh look. Someone else has spotted that the Eurovision Song Contest is rigged
at 22-5-2013 12:16
The Official Arsenal 2012/2013 Season Thread
at 22-5-2013 11:19
The new Flickr
at 22-5-2013 11:17
Eddie Braben (1930-2013)
at 22-5-2013 10:54
Car insurance - anyone know what a `limited match` claim is?
at 22-5-2013 09:49
Official Summer 2013 Transfer Thread
at 22-5-2013 08:30
Xbox One
at 22-5-2013 08:09
Doctor Who: The Next Regeneration...
at 22-5-2013 00:29
Rare Colour Footage of London in 1927
at 21-5-2013 20:18
[VIDEO] Videoing instead of watching live events
at 21-5-2013 12:50
My USB Ports Not Working Properly?
at 21-5-2013 11:10
Champions League final
at 21-5-2013 10:02
Game of Thrones (Season 3)
at 21-5-2013 07:50
[VIDEO] The Last of Us
at 20-5-2013 22:38
buy african mango plus
at 20-5-2013 11:42
Smart Parking Limited also trading as Town & City Parking- Parking Charge Notice
at 20-5-2013 00:47
I could make a fortune- NOT !!!!!!!
at 19-5-2013 16:51
LG DH905
at 19-5-2013 15:55
[VIDEO] Excercise video... Erm
at 19-5-2013 13:45
Android firmware update
at 19-5-2013 12:48
posted by Rob Shepherd on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 11:56
Super Admin
Looks like a great cast, but also looks like it's all been done before, and Sam Raimi's trilogy was so well made, it just smacks of a cash in reboot to me. 
Editor
DVD REVIEWER
MYREVIEWER.COM
My Flickr Photostream
posted by 1mills on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 12:20
Elite
That's exactly what I thought Rob.
Raimi's were a bit cheesy for my taste at times, but this doesn't seem massively far off either.
One thing is it's not a "cash in" as such, they have to make a film every certain number of years or the rights revert back to Marvel.
Which is why the famous Fantastic Four film from the 90's was made with no intention of going to cinema, but purely so a film was technically made.
They are currently pushing on with a Fantastic Four reboot because of this also.
Personally I think they should have gone down the Hulk route of just making a film that uses the character and ignores the origin aspect.
www.last.fm/user/1mills
posted by JohnnyTV on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 12:58
Elite
I didn't think much of the first trailer but looking forward to this now. Loved the Raimi trilogy and since that hasn't continued it's the next best thing I suppose.
posted by Rob Shepherd on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 12:59
Super Admin
I wonder how bad and cheap a film they can make to retain the license? I know some of them have been pretty bad, but I'm thinking really terrible straight to video, not even good enough for a daytime Channel 5 movie type affair.
Editor
DVD REVIEWER
MYREVIEWER.COM
My Flickr Photostream
posted by 1mills on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 14:56
Elite
The Fantastic Four one was made in 1994.
It cost $1,500,000 to make and was never released in any format and the directors and actors weren't actually aware of this.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c6/Ffmovie1994.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fantastic_Four_(film)
www.last.fm/user/1mills
This item was edited on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 14:57
posted by mbilko on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 15:00
Elite
I have a copy of the original FF movie.......its one of those its so bad its go.....no it is awful 
posted by smurfette on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 15:04
Elite Donator
I'm really not interested in this. It just makes me want to put the Sam Raimi trilogy on my TV again. Haven't watched them in a while...
Don't like the look of this Peter Parker at all anyway.
posted by Mark Oates on Wednesday, 8th February 2012, 19:06
Reviewer
I didn't really care for the Raimi SpiderMan trilogy in the first place. I think it's waaaaaaay too soon to be thinking about a reboot, especially when there are better Marvel franchises still untouched. Nothing about this new movie makes me want to see it, either in the cinema, on disc or as a graveyard-slot transmission with sign language on ITV1.
J Mark Oates
--------------------
The Home Of Lively Debate
And Misinformed Comment
sprockethole.myreviewer.com
posted by Rob Shepherd on Saturday, 5th May 2012, 12:03
Super Admin
http://io9.com/5907537/new-amazing-spider+man-trailer-delivers-angst-and-awesome-quips
When did this parents storyline happen in the comics? Is it a recent thing?
Editor
DVD REVIEWER
MYREVIEWER.COM
My Flickr Photostream
Reviewer
There's a ton of Studio politicking involved in this movie. Sam Raimi was developing Spider-Man 4 for Sony, but couldn't agree on a script ready for the picture's due date this month. Sony pulled the plug on the project and simultaneously announced a "reboot" with a completely different production team. But a suspiciously similar script.
I suspect they couldn't fire Raimi without starting a lawsuit, but a "reboot" let all parties off the hook without looking in any way acrimonious.
It just makes me even less interested in seeing the movie.
J Mark Oates
--------------------
I Like Cheese. To The Extent That
If Somebody Asks Me
"Are You A Man Or A Mouse?"
I Have To Think About It.
sprockethole.myreviewer.com